BERNEV / CUSTOMS LAW
Menu

Labelling

Labelling works only when the parties’ roles, codes and shipment documents tell one consistent story

Review the importer’s role, codes, universal transfer document, product record, date the goods entered circulation and system notices. That shows whether the data flow should be corrected or a dispute prepared.

01Documentwhat customs or the bank sent
02Datewhen it was received and which deadline is running
03Amountadditional assessment, goods and route
04Actionresponse, appeal or evidence

Initial assessment

First establish what triggered the deadline

Document from customs or the bankWhat was received and which attachments are listed
  • it is unclear whether the goods require mandatory labelling based on the EAEU tariff code and product characteristics
  • the tariff code is borderline: labelled and unlabelled categories are close
  • it is unclear who is responsible for labelling on import: the importer, agent or supplier
  • release is delayed because the labelling status does not match the product documents
What to establish before respondingDeadline, amount, goods, route and evidence
  • checking mandatory labelling under the relevant Russian Government resolutions against the EAEU tariff code
  • determining who is responsible for applying codes and introducing the goods into circulation under the particular import model
  • preparing a documentary position for customs and a defence against a claim under Article 15.12 of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences
  • linking labelling with tariff classification, release and subsequent circulation of the goods

Documents and position

How the import-labelling position is prepared

Product scope and classification

I check the product group, EAEU tariff code, product description and technical characteristics used to determine whether mandatory labelling applies.

Participant role and circulation stage

I check who acts as importer and which participant is responsible for applying codes and introducing the goods into circulation under the relevant import model.

Labelling records

I compare the available code and application records, system notices, product documents and the dates relevant to import and introduction into circulation.

Point of discrepancy

I identify where the labelling status diverges from the customs, product or circulation documents and what needs to be addressed in an explanation, correction or dispute.

Common questions

Short questions on Chestny ZNAK and import labelling

Does importing a product from abroad automatically mean Chestny ZNAK labelling is required?
No. Mandatory identification labelling depends on the specific product group, EAEU tariff code, product characteristics and the current Russian Government rules for that category. Importation alone is not enough to determine applicability. Check the current Chestny Znak product-group information and the applicable Government resolution before import. Each product group can have its own start dates, transition rules and code-application requirements, so a static 2026 list should not be treated as exhaustive.
How are EAEU tariff codes connected with mandatory labelling?
The connection is direct: the EAEU tariff code and product description affect whether the goods are subject to labelling and under which product group. A classification error can therefore lead to the wrong labelling treatment. Possible scenarios include using a broader code that appears to fall within a labelled category when the correct code does not, or a narrower code that appears outside labelling when the correct code is covered. Adjacent codes may also have different implementation dates, and product use or the intended user may matter under the applicable rules. For clothing, for example, specified codes in Chapters 61 and 62 may be covered, but not every code in those chapters. The treatment of sportswear, workwear or medical clothing depends on the applicable rules. A classification error can create unnecessary labelling costs or leave goods unlabelled where labelling is required. Classification and labelling should therefore be checked together and recorded against the applicable legal sources.
When should an EAEU tariff code be checked: before import or before filing the declaration?
A pre-import classification review is particularly useful for technically complex goods, goods near the boundary between headings, or goods whose classification depends on function, composition or use. The classification analysis follows the General Rules for Interpretation (GRI 1–6) as a legal classification process. A supplier catalogue alone is not enough. The GRI are applied in sequence, starting with the wording of headings and the relevant section and chapter notes (GRI 1), then, where relevant, the special rules for incomplete goods, mixtures, sets or competing headings (GRI 2–3), by analogy where applicable (GRI 4), for cases and packing materials (GRI 5) and within subheadings (GRI 6). An error at any stage can change the tariff code and duty. A pre-import review includes a technical description focused on classification characteristics, selection and reasoning for the heading under the GRI, comparison with explanatory materials and EEC decisions, relevant case law and the risk of post-release reclassification. After declaration, the issue may already be a dispute involving recalculated duties and possibly proceedings under Part 2 of Article 16.2 of the Russian Code of Administrative Offences. Potential exposure can include recalculated duty and VAT and, where an administrative offence is established, a penalty under the applicable provision. Any effect on later shipments depends on the facts and the measures actually taken by customs.
Why can similar products receive different EAEU tariff codes?

Similar products can require different tariff analysis because classification depends on the product's actual characteristics rather than appearance or marketing name alone. The comparison should use available technical records showing construction, composition, functions and intended use.

For a specific product, compare those characteristics with the competing tariff descriptions and record why one classification position is being considered over another. If the technical file is incomplete or inconsistent, that gap should be identified before a firm classification conclusion is drawn.

The written review therefore gives a documented comparison of the product characteristics and the competing classification positions, rather than a code selected from the commercial name alone.

Received a request, customs value adjustment or decision? First record the deadline

For an initial review, provide the document, date of receipt, goods declaration, contract or invoice, and amount at risk. The review will show whether the first step should be an explanation, appeal, document request or court materials.

Before responding

Have a customs document? Check the deadline first

Send the document title, date of receipt, amount at risk and what has already been submitted. The review will show whether to prepare a response, appeal, document request or court materials.

Materials on this issue

Continue with this topic

All articles